Friday, December 11, 2015
Saturday, November 21, 2015
Inconvenienced
I had toiled in obscurity on this blog that became more important to me long after I conceived of it. Lately I have not posted many written entries as it became more of a chore to my ill humored tired old body. Yet it was still fun to post, well, convenient things (images, articles, or memes) which happened along. Plop, there it is.
Recently my disappointment with "Christians" blossomed as I actually maintain a strong belief in God, under duress, along with a strong belief in science, also under duress. This despite how it may appear here. Although I am tired and dulled by life, every once in a while things boil up above a line on the beaker that makes the measure of effort to write worthwhile.
Syrian refugees.
These are people running away from an evil that, to me, rivals that of Adolph Hitler. It is an evil different from Hitler who used the big lie to present a seemingly civilized face to the world. Today's evil is an in-your-face anarchy that makes me wonder about things that were previously crystalline in my mind. It is a Jim Jones type of evil. It is Manson. Things this evil make you wonder about completely innocent things; like whether train schedules are really ok. Similarly the probable destruction of the world by global warming has made me wonder about the automobile that gets me to work and gives me free time.
The idea that bit me about Syrian refugees was the amount of "Christian" outrage against helping people in need.
I harangue a lot here. Just let me say simply that organized religion has topped itself if it can add more words from the Bible we must ignore or twist to the point of meaninglessness. The heart of the message is gone here. Are the cell phones rotting brain cells or something? Not everyone is infected but the doctors in charge appear to be ignorant or corrupt in thought.
Long ago I realized people believed things that were convenient to believe. It is not like we go out of our way to vet all the knowledge passed on to us by our parents. That would just be inconvenient so we just accept what we are given.
I am kind of sure it is not an entirely different level of inconvenience that ended in an 11 year old girl with a bomb strapped to her body in a recent terrorist act.
Recently my disappointment with "Christians" blossomed as I actually maintain a strong belief in God, under duress, along with a strong belief in science, also under duress. This despite how it may appear here. Although I am tired and dulled by life, every once in a while things boil up above a line on the beaker that makes the measure of effort to write worthwhile.
Syrian refugees.
These are people running away from an evil that, to me, rivals that of Adolph Hitler. It is an evil different from Hitler who used the big lie to present a seemingly civilized face to the world. Today's evil is an in-your-face anarchy that makes me wonder about things that were previously crystalline in my mind. It is a Jim Jones type of evil. It is Manson. Things this evil make you wonder about completely innocent things; like whether train schedules are really ok. Similarly the probable destruction of the world by global warming has made me wonder about the automobile that gets me to work and gives me free time.
The idea that bit me about Syrian refugees was the amount of "Christian" outrage against helping people in need.
I harangue a lot here. Just let me say simply that organized religion has topped itself if it can add more words from the Bible we must ignore or twist to the point of meaninglessness. The heart of the message is gone here. Are the cell phones rotting brain cells or something? Not everyone is infected but the doctors in charge appear to be ignorant or corrupt in thought.
Long ago I realized people believed things that were convenient to believe. It is not like we go out of our way to vet all the knowledge passed on to us by our parents. That would just be inconvenient so we just accept what we are given.
I am kind of sure it is not an entirely different level of inconvenience that ended in an 11 year old girl with a bomb strapped to her body in a recent terrorist act.
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Monday, August 17, 2015
Saturday, August 15, 2015
Friday, August 14, 2015
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
Scientific Certainty
"As with many nutrition tips, though, including some offered by the Dietary Guidelines, the tidbit about skipping breakfast is based on scientific speculation, not certainty, and indeed, it may be completely unfounded, as the experiment in New York indicated."
I simply do not understand how I can acquire the certainty that so many scientific folks have without litterally sacrificing my soul. :) It seems like every time one grabs hold of something as the truth, and applies it to one's life... a rug is pulled out from under one's feet.
Is it really a stretch to think that science, as a group of knowledgeable statements, is just as likely to be wrong as right? Or... is there something I need to know that tells me when to believe science and when to disbelieve it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/rweb/biz/what-nutritionists-may-have-gotten-wrong-about-skipping-breakfast/2015/08/10/9b4d5dcf71019a69d62701315ad34a4c_story.html?wpisrc=nl_draw
Friday, August 7, 2015
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Monday, July 20, 2015
Friday, July 17, 2015
Call me crazy but...
[The recent revelations from Exxon in funding climate denial make it obvious that science and our public servants have been in the hands of the highest bidder. Sure it is fun to watch the Pluto flyby, drive cars around, and use manufacturing technology to create cheap things... but honestly, science technology was not worth an apocalypse. We would stand a better chance of survival if if we were completely socialist agrarians. The only people between the scientists and judgement for their deeds are the people of faith. Those who believe in the infallibility of "science" things do not judge their own scientists because the fruit from the tree of science is deemed to be good because, well, "science." Then there are those who do not believe in climate change. Both have a faith in "everything works out." -md]
Warming of the Oceans Due to Climate Change is Unstoppable, say U.S. Scientists
Warming of the Oceans Due to Climate Change is Unstoppable, say U.S. Scientists
by Suzanne Goldenberg theguardian
The warming of the oceans due to climate change is now unstoppable after record temperatures last year, bringing additional sea-level rise, and raising the risks of severe storms, US government climate scientists said on Thursday.
The annual State of the Climate in 2014 report, based on research from 413 scientists from 58 countries, found record warming on the surface and upper levels of the oceans, especially in the North Pacific, in line with earlier findings of 2014 as the hottest year on record.
Global sea-level also reached a record high, with the expansion of those warming waters, keeping pace with the 3.2 ± 0.4 mm per year trend in sea level growth over the past two decades, the report said.
Scientists said the consequences of those warmer ocean temperatures would be felt for centuries to come – even if there were immediate efforts to cut the carbon emissions fuelling changes in the oceans.
“I think of it more like a fly wheel or a freight train. It takes a big push to get it going but it is moving now and will continue to move long after we continue to pushing it,” Greg Johnson, an oceanographer at Noaa’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, told a conference call with reporters.
“Even if we were to freeze greenhouse gases at current levels, the sea would actually continue to warm for centuries and millennia, and as they continue to warm and expand the sea levels will continue to rise,” Johnson said.
On the west coast of the US, freakishly warm temperatures in the Pacific – 4 or 5F above normal – were already producing warmer winters, as well as worsening drought conditions by melting the snowpack, he said.
The extra heat in the oceans was also contributing to more intense storms, Tom Karl, director of Noaa’s National Centers for Environmental Information, said.
The report underlined 2014 as a banner year for the climate, setting record or near record levels for temperature extremes, and loss of glaciers and sea ice, and reinforcing decades-old pattern to changes to the climate system.
Four independent data sets confirmed 2014 as the hottest year on record, with much of that heat driven by the warming of the oceans.
Globally 90% of the excess heat caused by the rise in greenhouse gas emissions is absorbed by the oceans.
More than 20 countries in Europe set new heat records, with Africa, Asia and Australia also experiencing near-record heat. The east coast of North America was the only region to experience cooler than average conditions.
Alaska experienced temperatures 18F warmer than average. Spring break-up came to the Arctic 20-30 days earlier than the 20th century average.
“The prognosis is to expect a continuation of what we have seen,” Karl said.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
deGrasse Tyson needs fact checked by Stephen Colbert
Tyson is a celebrity and celebrities really have no room in science. deGrasse Tyson needs fact checked on science fact about Pluto's size by a comedian at 3:15. Listen to Tyson use the phrase "more bigger" at 11:30.
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
Monday, July 13, 2015
Monday, May 4, 2015
Friday, April 24, 2015
Monday, April 6, 2015
Sunday, April 5, 2015
Saturday, March 28, 2015
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Monday, February 9, 2015
Saturday, February 7, 2015
What do Brian Williams and Neil deGrasse Tyson have in common?
Excerpt from: "Recent history knows -- quite accurately, Mr. Williams -- other false memories" CNN
Astrophysicist and television host Neil deGrasse Tyson, a protege of the late Carl Sagan, claimed he heard President George W. Bush make a remark intended to highlight divisions between Judeo-Christian Americans and fundamentalist Muslims.
Tyson's assertion is still published on the webpage of the Hayden Planetarium, which he runs.
"After the 9/11 attacks, when President George W. Bush, in a speech aimed at distinguishing the U.S. from the Muslim fundamentalists, said, 'Our God is the God who named the stars.' The problem is two-thirds of all the stars that have names, have Arabic names. I don't think he knew this. This would confound the point that he was making," Tyson said in a 2008 speech.
Fact checkers found Tyson's recollection to be wrong, and The New York Times even published an opinion piece in December 2014 by two psychology professors about the Tyson incident and "Why Our Memory Fails Us."
"In his post-9/11 speech, Mr. Bush actually said, 'The enemy of America is not our many Muslim friends,' and he said nothing about the stars," wrote professors Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons.
"Mr. Bush had indeed once said something like what Dr. Tyson remembered; in 2003 Mr. Bush said, in tribute to the astronauts lost in the Columbia space shuttle explosion, that 'the same creator who names the stars also knows the names of the seven souls we mourn today.' ''
Tyson later published an explanation and an apology on his Facebook page. He noted how "blogosphere headlines" carried "accusations of me being a compulsive liar and a fabricator."
"And I here publicly apologize to the President for casting his quote in the context of contrasting religions rather than as a poetic reference to the lost souls of Columbia. I have no excuse for this, other than both events -- so close to one another -- upset me greatly. In retrospect, I'm surprised I remembered any details from either of them," Tyson wrote in September 2014.
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Saturday, January 24, 2015
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Friday, January 16, 2015
Chocolate is Good for Us in Some Way, right?
[ Well, surely it means something when scientists say that something is healthful or not healthful. Right? Well, no Virginia, there isn't a Science Claus. Capitalism is at the heart of our system, and capitalism, well, it invented something called "advertising" which previously had been called "lying" by almost everyone. And well, scientists are involved in this thing called lying.. umm advertising. Sorry, young lady, let's move on. Here is a healthy dark chocolate candy bar. ]
Oh Noes! The Bitter Truth About Chocolate
byGwennedd Daily Kos Sun Jan 11, 2015 at 10:18 AM PST
Most of us here love our chocolate, many love the darker stronger type, and it's safe to say about half of DKos is slightly addicted to the smooth mellow taste of chocolate. We chocaholics congratulate ourselves on the fact that eating chocolate has many health benefits; namely lowered blood pressure, improved brain function, lowered risk of cardiovascular disease and it's nutritious. Right?
Well...no.You want the truth? Can you handle the truth? Then read on, gentle reader.
More than a decade ago researchers discovered that some of the peoples of Panama, namely the Kuna, had very low blood pressure, even when elderly. The Kuna live on some small Caribbean islands and drink a fair amount of cocoa every day as a part of their spiritual rituals. And it was assumed that the cocoa drinking was the reason for the Kuna's lower blood pressure. In fact, Mars Inc funded a study investigating the benefits of cocoa, using the Kuna as the basis of their research. And the studies done found there were indeed health benefits to consuming cocoa and chocolate. Some years later, the results of various studies were touting the benefits of antioxidant flavanols found in raw cocoa beans, and therefore, placed chocolate in the list of beneficial super foods. Something people should be consuming several times a week.
Well, great! That's not bad news. Flavinols are good for us.... but, what are "flavanols"?
According to Wiki:
And these flavaoids have been shown to have a wide range of health benefits in vitro, a fancy term for in an artificial environment outside of the human body. Such benefits include: anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-microbial, antifungal, and antiviral, as well as anticancer and anti-diarrheal. It is important to note that none of the in vitro studies have involved human subjects, and so can not be relied on to prove that these flavaniods work just as well in humans. For our discussion, the most pertinent part of flavanols are the ones found in tea, coffee and chocolate. These are known as catechins
Sadly, that is not proving to be the case. The flavanols that are so apparent in raw cocoa beans are not there in cocoa or chocolate. Heating the beans, roasting them as is commonly done to make cocoa, destroys most of the flavinols. Our delicious superfood becomes simply a treat that has little nutrition and too much sugar.
So how did Mars Inc manage to get such good results from their tests with cocoa powder? That's apparently a secret. They also never told the public that.
[ And as for Mars, Inc.? "how did Mars Inc. manage to get such good results from their tests with cocoa powder? That's apparently a secret. They also never told the public that." Because, that is the way of science isn't it? Secrecy and not letting others test your results. And the company did not tell the public. Hmmm, they cannot be blamed but who told the public. Was it "scientists"? How do I know when a scientist is a scientist? When you think about it long enough you want to put a pox on Mars or a pox on science... or perhaps the media. ...or piss on all of them because none adequately policed themselves in morality. ]
Well, great! That's not bad news. Flavinols are good for us.... but, what are "flavanols"?
According to Wiki:
Flavonoids (specifically flavanoids such as the catechins) are "the most common group of polyphenolic compounds in the human diet and are found ubiquitously in plants".[47] Flavonols, the original bioflavonoids such as quercetin, are also found ubiquitously, but in lesser quantities. The widespread distribution of flavonoids, their variety and their relatively low toxicity compared to other active plant compounds (for instance alkaloids) mean that many animals, including humans, ingest significant quantities in their diet. Foods with a high flavonoid content include parsley,[48] onions,[48] blueberries and other berries,[48] black tea,[48] green tea and oolong tea,[48] bananas, all citrus fruits, Ginkgo biloba, red wine, sea-buckthorns, and dark chocolate (with a cocoa content of 70% or greater). Further information on dietary sources of flavonoids can be obtained from the US Department of Agriculture flavonoid database.[48] Also, the Peanut red skin.
And these flavaoids have been shown to have a wide range of health benefits in vitro, a fancy term for in an artificial environment outside of the human body. Such benefits include: anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-microbial, antifungal, and antiviral, as well as anticancer and anti-diarrheal. It is important to note that none of the in vitro studies have involved human subjects, and so can not be relied on to prove that these flavaniods work just as well in humans. For our discussion, the most pertinent part of flavanols are the ones found in tea, coffee and chocolate. These are known as catechins
The catechins are abundant in teas derived from the tea plant Camellia sinensis, as well as in some cocoas and chocolates[2] (made from the seeds of Theobroma cacao). Catechins are also present in the human diet in fruits, vegetables and wine,[3] and are found in many other plant species, as well as cocoa.[4][5You will note that these catechins are found mostly in tea, coffee and some cocoas. And the Kuna were using that kind of cocoa. So the scientists from Mars. Inc. took samples of the cocoa beans from around where the Kuna lived, ground the beans, and tested them. The results showed that indeed the cocoa beans had good supplies of flavanols, and therefore should be beneficial to people.
Sadly, that is not proving to be the case. The flavanols that are so apparent in raw cocoa beans are not there in cocoa or chocolate. Heating the beans, roasting them as is commonly done to make cocoa, destroys most of the flavinols. Our delicious superfood becomes simply a treat that has little nutrition and too much sugar.
So how did Mars Inc manage to get such good results from their tests with cocoa powder? That's apparently a secret. They also never told the public that.
But those flavanols largely disappear once the cocoa bean is heated, fermented and processed into chocolate. In other words, making chocolate destroys the very ingredient that is supposed to make it healthy.
That’s why Small’s memory study used a highly concentrated powder prepared exclusively for research by Mars Inc., the chocolate company, which also partially funded the study.
"It is not a commercially available product," said Catherine Kwik-Uribe, the scientific director at Mars Inc. "It’s actually very difficult for an average consumer today to get the flavanol levels that we see are needed in order to produce some of the effects."This study and the lack of transparency has raised some disturbing questions about the role of private interests and companies who fund research, and just how much influence these companies have over not just the results, but the aims and focus of the research itself and what findings are published. The other thing I should note is that since heat destroys flavanols, then all flavanols found in other sources, such as fruits and vegetables will be similarly destroyed by heating the veg or fruit. In other words...if you want the health benefits from flavanols, you have to eat your fruits and veggies raw and soon after picking. A general rule of thumb; any fruit or veggie should be eaten before they're two weeks old.
[ And as for Mars, Inc.? "how did Mars Inc. manage to get such good results from their tests with cocoa powder? That's apparently a secret. They also never told the public that." Because, that is the way of science isn't it? Secrecy and not letting others test your results. And the company did not tell the public. Hmmm, they cannot be blamed but who told the public. Was it "scientists"? How do I know when a scientist is a scientist? When you think about it long enough you want to put a pox on Mars or a pox on science... or perhaps the media. ...or piss on all of them because none adequately policed themselves in morality. ]
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
Social Influence
Also see previous installment: Social Thinking
I was always impressed that concepts in Social Psychology were the most relevant to what I perceived life to be. The experiments in this area are obviously very primitive but when considered with a general perspective tend to point out the failures and achievements of society very clearly in terms of process. I did not think the same way about sociology which seemed to be a more descriptive science that while practical was also distanced from any real experimental checks on its high capacity to formulate opinions. I have very strong opinions about economics and social issues but I have no real answers I can depend on as true in some absolute way. However the description of the process of the group dynamics, the importance of the influence of the individual, the concept of bullying and authority, etc. go to the heart of much of the experiences we have in daily life.
Sunday, January 11, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)